Journal of Laboratory Physicians
Home About us Ahead of print Current issue Back issues Subscribe Instructions Contact Login 
Wide layoutNarrow layoutPrint this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size 
 


 
   Table of Contents     
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 8  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 45-49  

Prevalence of Beta-Hemolytic Streptococci Groups A, C, and G in Patients with Acute Pharyngitis


1 Department of Microbiology, Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Shivamogga, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Microbiology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Microbiology, Al-Ameen Medical College, Bijapur, Karnataka, India

Date of Web Publication12-Feb-2016

Correspondence Address:
Trupti B Naik
Department of Microbiology, Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Shivamogga, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0974-2727.176235

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Context: Group A beta-hemolytic streptococci (GAS) is the most frequently isolated pathogen in acute pharyngitis. However, the role of Group C (GCS) and Group G (GGS) streptococci in disease burden is under recognized. The present study is carried out to find out the prevalence of acute pharyngitis caused by the different serogroups of streptococci and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of these streptococcal isolates.
Study and Design: A cross sectional study.
Materials and Methods: A total of 218 throat swabs from patients with acute pharyngitis and 82 from healthy controls were collected and processed as per standard protocol. Samples were inoculated on blood agar and Streptococcus selective agar. Isolates were identifi ed by the conventional method and serogrouped by latex agglutination test using Remel Streptex kit.
Results: Beta-hemolytic streptococci (BHS) were isolated from 34 (15.59%) of pharyngitis patients and 11 (13.41%) of the healthy carrier. Among pharyngitis, GAS was isolated from 20 (9.17%), GCS 7 (3.21%), and GGS 7 (3.21%) patients. Carriage rate of GAS was 6 (7.31%) and GCS, 5 (6.09%). Vancomycin (100%), amoxyclavulanic acid (90%), levofloxacin (85%), and cephotaxime (80%) were found to be most effective antibiotics. Comparatively, higher drug resistance was observed among GCS and GGS to all the drugs used in the study except for levofloxacin.
Conclusions: Although rate of pharyngitis associated with GCS and GGS is marginally lower than GAS, their carriage rate among healthy and relative higher drug resistance emphasizes the need for periodic surveillance of infection by the different serogroups of BHS.

Keywords: Beta, Groups A, C, and G, hemolytic, pharyngitis, streptococci


How to cite this article:
Naik TB, Nadagir SD, Biradar A. Prevalence of Beta-Hemolytic Streptococci Groups A, C, and G in Patients with Acute Pharyngitis. J Lab Physicians 2016;8:45-9

How to cite this URL:
Naik TB, Nadagir SD, Biradar A. Prevalence of Beta-Hemolytic Streptococci Groups A, C, and G in Patients with Acute Pharyngitis. J Lab Physicians [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Dec 5];8:45-9. Available from: http://www.jlponline.org/text.asp?2016/8/1/45/176235


   Introduction Top


Beta-hemolytic streptococci (BHS) cause a wide spectrum of clinical diseases. Pharyngitis and associated complications are the most common clinical presentation for Group A streptococci (GAS). Invasive GAS infections have increased worldwide during the past decade despite organism remaining sensitive to penicillin and other commonly used beta-lactam antibiotics.[1]

GAS have been described frequently as an emerging cause of severe invasive infections in population-based surveillance studies, whereas the descriptions of group B, C, and G streptococci (GBS, GCS, and GGS) have been less frequent. It is not possible to differentiate between invasive infections caused by GAS, GBS, GCS, or GGS solely on the clinical presentation.[2]

BHS from groups other than Group A have been associated with outbreaks of pharyngitis, but their importance in causing endemic pharyngitis remains uncertain. Since non-Group A, BHS are inhabitants of the oropharynx during both health and disease, proof of their pathogenicity requires the isolation of strains more frequently among symptomatic patients with pharyngitis than among healthy person.[3]

While reports of the recovery of GGS/GCS from normally sterile sites are increasing, studies describing GGS/GCS throat colonization rates relative to GAS in the same population are very few.

The present study has been undertaken to estimate the prevalence of different serogroups of streptococci, among patients with the signs of pharyngotonsillitis. Furthermore, to determine antibiotic susceptibility pattern to delineate any differences between infections caused by GCS, GGS, and GAS in the same area during the same period.


   Materials and Methods Top


Study design

Cross-sectional study.

Inclusion criteria

All the consecutive patients suffering from acute pharyngitis, attending outpatient Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Medicine of Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences hospital, Hubli were included in the prospective study conducted during a 1-year period, from December 2011 to November 2012. Throat swabs were collected from a total of 218 patients and also from 82 appropriate age and sex matched healthy controls.

Exclusion criteria

Patients already on antibiotic therapy were excluded. Ethical clearance was obtained.

Two swabs were collected from each patient using sterile cotton tipped swab and transported in nutrient broth. The isolation and identification of BHS were done as per standard protocol.[4]

One swab was used to make smear for Grams-stain. The Gram-stained smears were observed under the microscope for the presence of pus cells and Gram-positive cocci in pairs and chains. The second swab was inoculated on to 5% sheep blood agar plate and Streptococcus selective agar using “streak-stab” technique. Streptococcus selective media is used to inhibit the growth of throat commensals by the addition of inhibitory agents such as colistin, nalidixic acid, crystal violet, and support the growth of streptococci by enriching the media with blood. The plates were incubated for 24–48 h using a candle jar with a 5–10% CO2. The plates were observed for the presence of any beta-hemolytic colonies. Subcultures were made from beta-hemolytic colonies using fresh blood agar plates. From the subcultured plates, identification of the beta-hemolytic colonies were done based on conventional biochemical reactions; catalase test and arginine dihydrolase test; fermentation of sugars; glucose, lactose, mannitol, ribose, sorbitol, and trehalose.[4] Presumptive identification of BHS was based on susceptibility and the resistant pattern of isolates using differential discs such as bacitracin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Serogrouping of BHS was done using Remel Streptex kit manufactured by Remel Europe Limited. Clipper Boulevard West, Crossways, Dartford, Kent, DA2 6PT, United Kingdom. Streptex is a rapid latex agglutination test system for use in the qualitative detection and identification of the Lancefield group of streptococci. Reagents are provided for Groups A, B, C, D, F, and G covering the majority of clinical isolates. Interpretations of results were done on the strength of agglutination.[5]

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done on MHA with 5% sheep blood agar by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines.[6] Microbial Type Culture Collection (MTCC) number 1926 Streptococcus pyogenes obtained from MTCC and Gene Bank, Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh was used as a control. Isolates were tested for ampicillin 10 μg, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 20/10 μg, erythromycin 15 μg, clindamycin 2 µg, levofloxacin 5 μg, tetracycline 30 μg, cephotaxime 30 μg, and vancomycin 30 μg. Statistical analysis was done by using Fisher's exact test.


   Results Top


Age group of patients was ranging from 1 to 80 years. Mean age was 24.03. A maximum number of cases 58 (26.6%) were in the age group of 1–10 years. Male to female ratio was 1:1.29.

Majority 110 (50.45%) of patients presented with fever and cough, 47 (21.55%) with sore throat, 83 (38.07%) with throat pain, 36 (16.51%) with difficulty in swallowing, and 2 (0.91%) with change of voice. The severity of infections among different serogroups is presented in [Table 1].
Table 1: Severity of infections among serogroups

Click here to view


BHS were isolated from 34 (15.59%) patients with pharyngitis and 11 (13.41%) healthy carriers. Among pharyngitis cases, the incidence of GAS was 20 (9.17%), GCS 7 (3.21%), and GGS 7 (3.21%). Carriage rate of GAS was 6 (7.31%) and GCS 5 (6.09%).

Antibiotic resistant pattern of Group A, Group C, and Group G Streptococci isolated from throat swab presented in [Table 2].
Table 2: Antibiotic resistant pattern of Group A, Group C and Group G streptococci isolated from patients throat swab

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


S. pyogenes (GAS), a human pathogen and Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis (GGS/GCS) are evolutionarily related, share the same tissue niche in humans, exchange genetic material, share up to half of their virulence associated genes, and cause a similar spectrum of diseases. Yet, GGS/GCS are often considered as a commensal bacterium and its role in streptococcal disease burden is under recognized.

The etiological agents of acute pharyngitis include viruses, isolated in approximately 40–60% of cases and primary bacterial pathogens, which account for approximately 5–30% of cases. In around 30% of cases, no pathogen is isolated.[7] The most important source of concern is infection with Group A beta-hemolytic S. pyogenes, that is, associated with acute glomerulonephritis and acute rheumatic fever.[8]

In the present study, among adults overall the prevalence of pharyngitis was found to be 7.04% and among children 12.91%. A similar observation was made by Kumar et al. among children,[9] comparatively higher incidence rate was reported by Bramhachari et al.[3]

We have isolated 83 (38.07%) bacterial pathogens from pharyngitis cases. Among these BHS were predominant organisms 34 (40.96%). The prevalence of BHS was 15.59%. Slightly, the lower prevalence rate of GAS was observed by Sindhulina et al. from CMC Vellore.[10] No significant gender difference was observed. Our findings correlate with Nandi et al.[11] Majority of the cases 152 (69.72%) belonged to an urban area.

Maximum number 157 (72.01%) of pharyngitis cases occurred in the month of October (winter season). Some studies have noted two peak incidences in May and September with sporadic cases of pharyngitis throughout the year.[9],[12]

By latex agglutination test, 20 (58.82%) isolates were identified as GAS, 7 (20.58%) as GCS and, 7 (20.58%) as GGS. The prevalence of GAS was 20 (9.17%). Different studies have quoted rates ranging from 2.8% to 40%.[3],[9]

The roles of GCS and GGS in causing endemic pharyngitis are still controversial, although GCS are implicated in the outbreak of pharyngitis and associated disorders. GCS and GGS have also been described as frequent invasive pathogens in elderly patients, often in association with alcohol abuse, diabetes mellitus, malignant diseases, cardiac, and peripheral vascular diseases.[2]

The prevalence of GCS was 7 (3.21%) and GGS 7 (3.21%). The frequency of GCS and GGS isolates from acute pharyngitis from different regions ranges from 0.7% to 6.24% and 3.74% to 5.1%, respectively.[12],[13]

BHS were isolated from 11 (13.41%) of asymptomatic healthy controls. The percentage of asymptomatic GAS carriers was 6 (7.31%) and GCS was 5 (6.09%). GGS was not isolated from the healthy control group. Our study is comparable with Lloyd et al.[14] carriage rate of GAS ranging from 1.3% to14.9%,[3],[8],[14] GCS ranging from 0.97% to 11%,[3],[14] and GGS ranging from 2.4% to 11%[3],[14] from asymptomatic individuals have been reported by various studies.

All 20 (100%) GAS, 5 (71.42%) of GCS, and 4 (57.14%) of GGS isolates from acute pharyngitis were sensitive to bacitracin. All 6 (100%) GAS and 2 (40%) GCS of isolates from healthy control throat swabs were also sensitive to bacitracin. All the GAS isolates from acute pharyngitis and healthy controls were resistant to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim. All the GCS and GGS isolates were sensitive to trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole. Menon et al. reported that 9.8% strains of GAS were resistant to bacitracin, whereas 85.7% strains of GGS and 90% strains of GCS were sensitive to bacitracin.[15]

Antibiotic susceptibility test revealed the majority of GAS and GCS isolates from acute pharyngitis patients and healthy control group were sensitive for amoxyclavulanic acid, levofloxacin, and cephotaxime. Maximum resistance was observed to erythromycin and clindamycin. All the GGS isolates were sensitive to levofloxacin, resistant to clindamycin and erythromycin. Most of the GGS isolates were sensitive to amoxyclavulanic acid, tetracycline, and cephotaxime. The majority of GAS 4 (66.66%) and 2 (40%) of GCS isolates from healthy controls were resistant to tetracycline. A similar observation was made by Ho et al. with isolates resistant to erythromycin and tetracycline.[16] All the isolates were sensitive to vancomycin.

Most of the studies have quoted all the GAS isolates being sensitive to penicillin, cefotaxime, and vancomycin.[17] Al-Charrakh et al. quoted high bacterial resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics-ampicillin, third generation cephalosporins-cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and fourth generation cephalosporin-cefepime.[18]

Macrolides have been effective in the treatment of individuals with S. pyogenes infection and a good alternative in patients who are allergic to penicillin. Unfortunately, because of the general use of these agents, macrolide-resistant S. pyogenes have been isolated by many different studies from India and other countries. We have observed 26 (55.31%) of BHS isolates resistant to both erythromycin and clindamycin. Resistance to erythromycin ranging from 3.4%[19] to 91.8%[20] has been quoted by various studies. Comparatively, the low rate of resistance was observed with clindamycin ranging from 0.6%[19] to 80%[20] and tetracycline ranging from 24%[19] to 50%.[17] None of the isolate in our study revealed inducible clindamycin resistance.

In comparison with GAS, GCS exhibited a higher range of drug resistance to all the antibiotics tested in our study, except for levofloxacin and tetracycline. However, statistically significant difference was not observed with any of the drugs. GGS also exhibited a higher range of drug resistance to all drugs tested except for levofloxacin. The statistical significant difference was observed toward erythromycin and clindamycin.


   Conclusion Top


Healthy carriers of BHS are sources for bacterial dissemination and even lead to severe epidemics. BHS pharyngitis is one of the most common bacterial diseases in a human being. Invasive infections caused by GAS, GBS, GCS, and GGS are still a major challenge for clinicians. Antimicrobial resistance among these is an emerging concern. Continued epidemiological and microbiological surveillance is necessary to assess the development of infections by different serogroups of BHS for better management of patients and to improve preventative strategies.

Acknowledgment

The technical assistance provided by KIMS, Hubli technical Staff is acknowledged. We also thank the Otorhinolaryngology and Medicine Departments for providing clinical information.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Mathur P, Kapil A, Das B, Dhawan B, Dwivedi SN. Invasive beta-haemolytic streptococcal infections in a tertiary care hospital in northern India. J Med Microbiol 2002;51:791-2.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Ekelund K, Skinhøj P, Madsen J, Konradsen HB. Invasive group A, B, C and G streptococcal infections in Denmark 1999-2002: Epidemiological and clinical aspects. Clin Microbiol Infect 2005;11:569-76.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Bramhachari PV, Kaul SY, McMillan DJ, Shaila MS, Karmarkar MG, Sriprakash KS. Disease burden due to Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis (group G and C Streptococcus) is higher than that due to Streptococcus pyogenes among Mumbai school children. J Med Microbiol 2010;59:220-3.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckenberger PC, Winn WC Jr, Woods GL, et al. Koneman's Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. Gram Positive Cocci Part II: Streptococci, Enterococci and the “Streptococcus –Like” Bacteria. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Publishers; 2006. p. 672-764.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Fox JW, Marcon MJ, Bonsu BK. Diagnosis of streptococcal pharyngitis by detection of Streptococcus pyogenes in posterior pharyngeal versus oral cavity specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:2593-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Twenty-Second Informational Supplement. Streptococcus Species β-hemolytic Group. CLSI Document M100-S22. Vol. 32. Wayne, PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2012. p. 108-10.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Gleeson M, Browning GG, Burton MJ, Clarke R, Hibbert J, Jones NS, et al. Scott Brown's Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. The Upper Digestive Tract. Acute and Chronic Pharyngeal Infection. 7th ed., Vol. 2. Great Britain: Edward Arnold Publishers; 2008. p. 1981-2024.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Longo DL, Kasper DL, Jameson JL, Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Hauser SL, et al. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. Pharyngitis, Sinusitis, Otitis and Other Upper Respiratory Tract Infections. 18th ed., Vol. 1. United States of America: McGraw-Hill Publishers; 2012. p. 255-67.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Kumar R, Vohra H, Chakraborty A, Sharma YP, Bandhopadhya S, Dhanda V, et al. Epidemiology of group A streptococcal pharyngitis and impetigo: A cross-sectional and follow up study in a rural community of northern India. Indian J Med Res 2009;130:765-71.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
10.
Sindhulina C, Geethalakshmi S, Thenmozhivalli PR, Jose JM, Brahmadathan KN. Bacteriological and molecular studies of group A streptococcal pharyngitis in a south Indian hospital. Indian J Med Microbiol 2008;26:197-8.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
11.
Nandi S, Kumar R, Ray P, Vohra H, Ganguly NK. Group A streptococcal sore throat in a Periurban population of northern India: A one-year prospective study. Bull World Health Organ 2001;79:528-33.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Peñalba Citores AC, Riaño Méndez B, Marañón Pardillo R, Míguez Navarro C, Vázquez López P, Guerrero Soler MM, et al. Incidence of streptococcal pharyngitis. An Pediatr (Barc) 2007;67:220-4.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Menon T, Shanmugasundaram S, Kumar MP, Kumar CP. Group A streptococcal infections of the pharynx in a rural population in south India. Indian J Med Res 2004;119 Suppl: 171-3.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Lloyd CA, Jacob SE, Menon T. Pharyngeal carriage of group A streptococci in school children in Chennai. Indian J Med Res 2006;124:195-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
15.
Menon T, Lloyd C, Jacob S. Should bacitracin sensitivity be used in the presumptive identification of group A streptococci? Indian J Med Microbiol 2005;23:275.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Ho PL, Johnson DR, Yue AW, Tsang DN, Que TL, Beall B, et al. Epidemiologic analysis of invasive and noninvasive group a streptococcal isolates in Hong Kong. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:937-42.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
de Melo MC, Sá Figueiredo AM, Ferreira-Carvalho BT. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and genomic diversity in strains of Streptococcus pyogenes isolated in 1978-1997 in different Brazilian cities. J Med Microbiol 2003;52:251-8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Al-Charrakh AH, Al-Khafaji JK, Al-Rubaye RH. Prevalence of ß-hemolytic groups C and F streptococci in patients with acute pharyngitis. N Am J Med Sci 2011;3:129-36.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Efstratiou A, Emery M, Lamagni TL, Tanna A, Warner M, George RC. Increasing incidence of group A streptococcal infections amongst injecting drug users in England and Wales. J Med Microbiol 2003;52:525-6.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Jing HB, Ning BA, Hao HJ, Zheng YL, Chang D, Jiang W, et al. Epidemiological analysis of group A streptococci recovered from patients in China. J Med Microbiol 2006;55:1101-7.  Back to cited text no. 20
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
  
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2091    
    Printed48    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded188    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal