Journal of Laboratory Physicians
Home About us Ahead of print Current issue Back issues Subscribe Instructions Contact Login 
Wide layoutNarrow layoutPrint this page  Email this page Bookmark this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size 
 


 
   Table of Contents     
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 144-148  

Microbiological profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Gram-positive isolates at a tertiary care hospital


1 Department of Microbiology, S. L. Raheja Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Critical Care Medicine, S. L. Raheja Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission29-Dec-2018
Date of Acceptance24-Feb-2019
Date of Web Publication27-May-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Dhruv Mamtora
Department of Microbiology, S. L. Raheja Hospital, Raheja Rugnalaya Marg, Mahim West, Mahim, Mumbai - 400 016, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JLP.JLP_173_18

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


OBJECTIVES: Gram-positive infections such as those by Staphylococcus aureus have contributed to the disease burden by increasing the morbidity and mortality rates in India. This study aims to determine the prevalence and the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Gram-positive pathogens at a tertiary care hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out from January, 2015 to December, 2017, at a tertiary care hospital in Mumbai, India. The clinical isolates were cultured, and identification was done using Vitek 2 culture system. The antibiotic susceptibility testing was done as per the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines.
RESULTS: Out of 2132 (29%) Gram-positive isolates, S. aureus (49%) was the most common encountered pathogen, followed by Enterococcus spp. (24.5%) and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (16%). Majority of the S. aureus were observed in patients with skin and soft-tissue infections (61.2%) followed by those suffering from respiratory (41%) and bloodstream infections (35%). Among the infections caused by S. aureus, the prevalence of methicillin resistance was 30%. While the MRSA isolates showed lower sensitivity toward co-trimoxazole (39%), clindamycin (30%), erythromycin (23%), and ciprofloxacin (10%), they showed higher susceptibility to linezolid (98%), vancomycin (98%), and teicoplanin (98%). All the isolates were found to be sensitive to daptomycin and tigecycline. While vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) formed 7.5%, the linezolid-resistant enterococcus species was as high as 4.1%.
CONCLUSION: The study showed a high prevalence of MRSA and VRE, thereby emphasizing the increasing antimicrobial resistance pattern of the Gram-positive pathogens. Therefore, there is an urgent need for novel antimicrobial stewardship to restrict the ongoing resistance rate among the isolates.

Keywords: Antibiotic susceptibility pattern, Gram-positive pathogen, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, prevalence, vancomycin-resistant enterococci


How to cite this article:
Mamtora D, Saseedharan S, Bhalekar P, Katakdhond S. Microbiological profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Gram-positive isolates at a tertiary care hospital. J Lab Physicians 2019;11:144-8

How to cite this URL:
Mamtora D, Saseedharan S, Bhalekar P, Katakdhond S. Microbiological profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Gram-positive isolates at a tertiary care hospital. J Lab Physicians [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Aug 25];11:144-8. Available from: http://www.jlponline.org/text.asp?2019/11/2/144/258957




   Introduction Top


The 1918 “Spanish flu” is one of the few examples of an infectious disease that has plagued humans and has prominently marked itself in history. More than a century now, infectious diseases are still the leading causes of disability, morbidity, and mortality worldwide.[1],[2] In India too, high rate of infections is a public health threat which is not only associated with increased mortality rate, but also responsible for disability and prolonged hospital stay.[3] The crude mortality rate in India is 417/100,000 persons.[4] Over the years, the poor antimicrobial stewardship in India has led to an increase in multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens in both community and hospital settings.[4],[5]

Gram-positive pathogens have played a crucial role in common infections such as sepsis, pneumonia, and urinary tract infections. Staphylococcus aureus is the major Gram-positive pathogen related to clinical infections ranging from bacteremia, skin and soft–tissue infections to device-related infections.[6] Methicillin Resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is a life-threatening nosocomial pathogen whose resistance pattern is contributed by either multiple mutations or by horizontal gene transfer. Moreover, according to national guidelines on antimicrobial use, patients infected with MRSA have a high mortality rate[7] which could be due to various factors such as late detection, manifestation of the underlying susceptibility to infections, and past antibiotic overuse. A recent multicentric study has reported the overall MRSA prevalence to be 37.3%;[8] however, other studies have reported the prevalence to range from 20.2% to 80.4% depending on the geographical region.[9],[10],[11],[12]

Apart from MRSA, another potential threat is the emergence of MDR enterococci, especially vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). Enterococcus species consisting of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium are the most common causative pathogens of urinary tract infections followed by bloodstream infections (BSIs).[13] Indian studies have shown VRE prevalence to vary from 1% to 9%, which has raised concerns for clinicians to treat difficult enterococcal infections in patients.[14],[15],[16],[17] The shift in the antibiotic paradigm has, therefore, made it necessary to investigate the susceptibility pattern of Gram-positive pathogens in order to select an appropriate antibiotic regimen for patients with resistant pathogens. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence and the antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Gram-positive pathogen in various infections in a tertiary care hospital in Mumbai.


   Materials and Methods Top


This retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out from January, 2015 to December, 2017, at a tertiary care hospital in Mumbai, India. The patient samples were processed using standard laboratory techniques and were further cultured overnight on Columbia sheep blood agar (CBA) (BioMérieux, France) and on MacConkey's agar (HIMedia, India). After colony characterization and Gram staining, the Gram-positive pathogens were processed and distinguished on the basis of catalase test, slide coagulase test, and tube coagulase test. Further, organism identification and antibiotic susceptibility test was done using the automated VITEK 2 compact system (BioMérieux, France). For streptococci identification, CBA plates were inoculated and Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion testing was done. The antibiotic susceptibility testing was reported as per the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criteria.[18],[19]


   Results Top


Prevalence of Gram-positive isolates

A total of 7393 bacterial isolates were analyzed from 2015 to 2017. Of the 2132 Gram-positive pool (29%), S. aureus (48.8%) formed the major encountered pathogen followed by Enterococcus spp. (24.6%) and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) (15.7%). [Table 1] summarizes the Gram-positive prevalence from 2015 to 2017.
Table 1: Total prevalence of Gram-positive pathogens in our hospital

Click here to view


Majority of S. aureus (61.2%) were isolated from patients with skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) followed by respiratory infections (41.1%) and BSIs (35.1%). Out of the total Gram-positive pathogens, 310 (14.5%) were MRSA isolates. Further, the MRSA isolates formed 29.7% of the total S. aureus identified, whereas the total methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) prevalence was 67.3% from 2015 to 2017. [Table 2] summarizes the MRSA prevalence from 2015 to 2017. [Table 3] summarises system wise infection prevalence of gram positive infections.
Table 2: Total methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-susceptible staphylococcus aureus prevalence in Gram-positive isolates from 2015 to 2017

Click here to view
Table 3: Total prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, Streptococcus spp., and Enterococcus spp.

Click here to view


Apart from S. aureus, the second most common infection in blood was caused by CoNS pathogens (39.7%). While 9.2% of the CoNS species were responsible for infection in patients with SSTIs, no role of these pathogens was observed in respiratory or urinary tract infections. Further, Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most common CoNS species in both BSI and SSTIs, representing 62.4% and 68% of the total CoNS species identified, respectively. Staphylococcus haemolyticus represented 12.4%. Other rare CoNS species identified included Staphylococcus hominis (6.5%), Staphylococcus lugdunensis (4.5%), Staphylococcus warneri (2%), Staphylococcus xylosus (1.5%), Staphylococcus capitis (1.2%), Staphylococcus urealyticus (<1%), Staphylococcus sciuri (<1%), and Staphylococcus saprophyticus (<1%).

Streptococcus spp. were the most dominant pathogen isolated in patients with respiratory tract infection (RTI) (47%), whereas in BSI and SSTIs, it was 12.9% and 9.6%, respectively. While Streptococcus pneumoniae (37.5%) was the most common Streptococcus spp. in RTI patients, patients with BSI and SSTIs also had Streptococcus pyogenes (12.2%), Streptococcus agalactiae (10%), Streptococcus mitis (1.8%), Streptococcus dys equisimilis (<1%), Streptococcus anginosus (<1%), and Streptococcus pasteurianus (<1%).

On the other hand, the total prevalence of Enterococcus faecalis was 30.8% while that of E. faecium was 8.4% of the total isolated Enterococcus species. In addition, Enterococcus spp. were the major causating pathogen behind urinary tract infections (95.4%), whereas only 19.7% and 11.7% were responsible for SSTIs and BSI, respectively.

Antibiotic sensitivity pattern in Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus spp.

An antibiotic sensitivity pattern for ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, clindamycin, co-trimoxazole, linezolid, vancomycin, daptomycin, tigecycline, and teicoplanin was determined. MRSA isolates showed lower sensitivity toward ciprofloxacin (10.2%), erythromycin (24%), clindamycin (30.2%), and co-trimoxazole (39.2%) as compared to MSSA isolates [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Antibiotic sensitivity pattern in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus isolates

Click here to view


Further, MRSA was shown to be highly susceptible toward linezolid (98%), vancomycin (97.7%), and teicoplanin (98.3%). All MRSA and MSSA isolates tested were found to be sensitive to daptomycin and tigecycline (100%). Moreover, none of the isolates were found to be sensitive to benzyl penicillin.

We also investigated the sensitivity pattern in Enterococcus spp., where they were highly susceptible to linezolid (96%), vancomycin (92%), and teicoplanin (93.3%) while being resistant to erythromycin and ciprofloxacin. Further, the prevalence of VRE was found to be 7.5%. [Figure 2] shows the sensitivity pattern for Enterococcus spp.
Figure 2: Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Enterococcus species

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


MDR bacterial infections have today become the biggest threat in the world due to the irrational use of antimicrobial agents. The European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care 2 study showed that, out of 47% of the Gram-positive isolates, 20% were S. aureus which was further associated with longer ICU stay.[20] In India too, Gram-positive infections, particularly MRSA, have been reported to increase exponentially from 29% in 2009 to 47% in 2014.[21] The overall MRSA prevalence in our study was 29.7%, which was lower than the recently reported prevalence of 37.3% by ICMR-AMRSN[8] and 40% as reported by INSAR study.[22] Furthermore, the prevalence varies among different centers across India ranging from 20.2% in Gujarat to 80.4% in Odisha. This variation could be attributed to the fact that different centers have different patient profiles and local antibiotic regimens that could influence the overall prevalence.

The ICMR-AMRSN study reported S. aureus to be the most frequently isolated organism in SSTI patients (73.7%).[8],[23] Similarly, our study also showed similar results with S. aureus isolates to be 61.2% in SSTI patients. Further, we also report a high prevalence of S. aureus (35.1%) in BSI patients. Recently, apart from SSTIs, S. aureus has also emerged to be a critical pathogen in BSIs.[24] This is further supported by a study conducted by Tak et al. where the crude mortality rate in patients with MRSA BSI was 31%.[25]

In 2010, India was the highest antibiotic consumer, with 10.7 units being consumed per person. Among BRICS countries, India registered an increase of 23% in the retail sale volume.[26] Therefore, easy availability and inappropriate antibiotic abuse has resulted in the development of antimicrobial resistance, which is difficult to treat and has become a national health disaster, today. In the present study, the MRSA isolates showed higher resistance toward ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, co-trimoxazole, and clindamycin as compared to MSSA isolates. Similar observations were also seen in previous multicentric studies.[8],[22] These findings justify the increased mortality rates[27] among patients infected with MRSA infections due to the ability of the pathogen to display varied resistance patterns toward various antibiotics. Moreover, both daptomycin and tigecycline remained the most effective antibiotics against S. aureus because there was no resistant isolate observed. This effect could be attributed to two reasons, with the higher cost of the drugs to be the primary reason due to which these drugs are not used very commonly. Second, both tigecycline and daptomycin are not the antibiotic of choice for treating BSIs and lung infections, both of which are the most common sources of infection in our hospital.

Vancomycin has been regarded as the first-line drug for the treatment of MRSA and MDR Enterococcus spp. Vancomycin was highly effective against MRSA isolates as we documented <1% of vancomycin-intermediate strains in them. However, a meta-analysis has shown vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (VISA) and hetero-VISA prevalence to be 15.09% and 12.41%, respectively.[28] While we observed only three (<1%) vancomycin-resistant isolates, a study by Singh et al. has reported 13% of VRSA isolates.[29]

The first vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis and E. faecium was reported in 1988 in England.[30] Subsequently, the first case of VRE was reported from New Delhi in 1999[31] because of unscrupulous use of vancomycin for Enterococcus treatment. In India, the prevalence of VRE infection is increasing with every passing year. In 2003, the VRE prevalence was 1%[14] which in 2013 has risen up to 8.7%.[17] In the present study too, a total of 39 (7.5%) VRE isolates were obtained. Moreover, eight isolates (1.5%) of E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus, which have inherent resistance to vancomycin, were also observed. However, out of the eight isolates, one isolate was vancomycin, linezolid, and teicoplanin resistant.

Linezolid is the only oral antibiotic available as compared to its other counterparts for the treatment of resistant staphylococcus species. Furthermore, linezolid is used as a reserved drug for the treatment of difficult extremely drug-resistant tuberculosis and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis.[32] However, linezolid overuse in the management of Gram-positive pathogens, which are otherwise easy to treat, has caused an emergence of linezolid-resistant strains. Globally, there are not much reports about the prevalence of linezolid-resistant S. aureus (<1%). A study from Rajasthan showed 12% of the linezolid-resistant S. aureus;[33] however, we show that 98% of the MRSA isolates were sensitive to linezolid, making it a potent drug for activity against resistant staphylococcus organisms. Further, in case of Enterococcus, linezolid is a successful therapeutic option if vancomycin treatment fails. Kumar et al. first reported linezolid-resistant enterococci (LRE) in 2014.[34] However, there are no further reports which document the prevalence of LRE, thereby making this the first study to show a high LRE prevalence of 4.1%. The high prevalence of LRE in our hospital may have resulted due to the increased MRSA prevalence which further corresponds to an increase in the use of linezolid empirically. Due to this, the antimicrobial stewardship program in the hospital has taken measures and has tightened the program in order to keep a check on the increasing resistant strains.


   Conclusion Top


This study demonstrates MRSA and VRE as a growing health problem in India. While, vancomycin and linezolid remain the preferred choice for MRSA and multiresistant Enterococcus treatment, the rise in both vancomycin- and linezolid-resistant strains has caused treatment dilemmas for clinicians. Therefore, the data generated provide in-depth knowledge of the changing antibiotic regimen against the difficult pathogens, thereby helping the physicians to make the right antibiotic choice at the start of the treatment. Further, there is an urgent need for new research molecules to combat the difficult MDR pathogens.

Acknowledgment

We thank Dr. Ritika Rampal, Dr. Jaishid Ahdal, and Wockhardt Ltd, an Indian pharmaceutical company for writing the manuscript.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet 2012;380:2095-128.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet 2012;380:2197-223.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
John TJ, Dandona L, Sharma VP, Kakkar M. Continuing challenge of infectious diseases in India. Lancet 2011;377:252-69.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Laxminarayan R, Chaudhury RR. Antibiotic resistance in India: Drivers and opportunities for action. PLoS Med 2016;13:e1001974.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Mave V, Chandanwale A, Kagal A, Khadse S, Kadam D, Bharadwaj R, et al. High burden of antimicrobial resistance and mortality among adults and children with community-onset bacterial infections in India. J Infect Dis 2017;215:1312-20.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Tong SY, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG Jr. Staphylococcus aureus infections: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev 2015;28:603-61.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
National Treatment Guidelines for Antimicrobial Use in Infectious Diseases. India: National centre for disease control, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and family welfare, Government of India; 2016 (version 1). p. 2.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Rajkumar S, Sistla S, Manoharan M, Sugumar M, Nagasundaram N, Parija SC, et al. Prevalence and genetic mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus species: A multicentre report of the Indian council of medical research antimicrobial resistance surveillance network. Indian J Med Microbiol 2017;35:53-60.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
9.
Trivedi MB, Vegad M, Soni S. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in various clinical samples in a tertiary-care hospital. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2015;4:1735-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Jindal N, Malhotra R, Grover P, Singh S, Bansal R, Kaur S, et al. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Malwa region of Punjab (North-west India). Indian J Med Res 2016;143:371-2.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
11.
Gupta R, Malik A, Rizvi M, Ahmed M, Hashmi A. Multidrug resistant Gram positive pathogens with special reference to MRSA and biofilm production in ICU patients: Recurrent challenge for clinicians. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 2015;1:207-12.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Dubey D, Rath S, Sahu MC, Pattnaik L, Debata NK, Padhy RN. Surveillance of infection status of drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an Indian teaching hospital. Asian Pac J Trop Dis 2013;3:133-42.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Sood S, Malhotra M, Das BK, Kapil A. Enterococcal infections & amp; antimicrobial resistance. Indian J Med Res 2008;128:111-21.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
14.
Mathur P, Kapil A, Chandra R, Sharma P, Das B. Antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus faecalis at a tertiary care centre of Northern India. Indian J Med Res 2003;118:25-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Taneja N, Rani P, Emmanuel R, Sharma M. Significance of vancomycin resistant enterococci from urinary specimens at a tertiary care centre in Northern India. Indian J Med Res 2004;119:72-4.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kaur N, Chaudhary U, Aggarwal R, Bala K. Emergence of VRE and their antimicrobial sensitivity pattern in a tertiary care teaching hospital. J Med Biol Sci 2009;8:26-32.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Praharaj I, Sujatha S, Parija SC. Phenotypic & genotypic characterization of vancomycin resistant Enterococcus isolates from clinical specimens. Indian J Med Res 2013;138:549-56.  Back to cited text no. 17
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
18.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 25th ed. CLSI Supplement M100. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 26th ed. CLSI Supplement M100S. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2016.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Vincent JL, Rello J, Marshall J, Silva E, Anzueto A, Martin CD, et al. International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units. JAMA 2009;302:2323-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy. Resistance Map. Washington DC: Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy; 2015.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Indian Network for Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (INSAR) group, India. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in India: Prevalence & susceptibility pattern. Indian J Med Res 2013;137:363-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Saseedharan S, Sahu M, Chaddha R, Pathrose E, Bal A, Bhalekar P, et al. Epidemiology of diabetic foot infections in a reference tertiary hospital in India. Braz J Microbiol 2018;49:401-6.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Patel AK, Patel KK, Patel KR, Shah S, Dileep P. Time trends in the epidemiology of microbial infections at a tertiary care center in west India over last 5 years. J Assoc Physicians India 2010;58 (Suppl):37-40.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Tak V, Mathur P, Lalwani S, Misra MC. Staphylococcal blood stream infections: Epidemiology, resistance pattern and outcome at a level 1 Indian trauma care center. J Lab Physicians 2013;5:46-50.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
26.
Van Boeckel TP, Gandra S, Ashok A, Caudron Q, Grenfell BT, Levin SA, et al. Global antibiotic consumption 2000 to 2010: An analysis of national pharmaceutical sales data. Lancet Infect Dis 2014;14:742-50.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Gandra S, Tseng KK, Arora A, Bhowmik B, Robinson ML, Panigrahi B, et al. The mortality burden of multidrug-resistant pathogens in India: A retrospective observational study. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2018.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Zhang S, Sun X, Chang W, Dai Y, Ma X. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of vancomycin-intermediate and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus isolates. PLoS One 2015;10:e0136082.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Singh H, Atray M, Modi PK. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus in tertiary care center at southern Rajasthan. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2014;5:607-11.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Uttley AH, Collins CH, Naidoo J, George RC. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Lancet 1988;1:57-8.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Mathur P, Chaudhary R, Dhawan B, Sharma N, Kumar L. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bacteraemia in a lymphoma patient. Indian J Med Microbiol 1999;17:194-5.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Maartens G, Benson CA. Linezolid for treating tuberculosis: A delicate balancing act. EBioMedicine 2015;2:1568-9.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Pavani G. Linezolid resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Res Med Sci 2017;2:1253-6.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Kumar S, Bandyoapdhyay M, Chatterjee M, Mukhopadhyay P, Poddar S, Banerjee P, et al. The first linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecium in India: High level resistance in a patient with no previous antibiotic exposure. Avicenna J Med 2014;4:13-6.  Back to cited text no. 34
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
  
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed376    
    Printed26    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded62    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal